Aminoglycosides



Link to HTML slides

Link to recorded lecture

NoteShort View Summary
  • Usual intravenous (IV) adult dose for gram-negative infections: 5–7 mg/kg every 24 hours for gentamicin and tobramycin; 15 mg/kg for plazomicin; and 20–30 mg/kg every 24 hours for amikacin
  • Usual dose for synergy against gram-positive infections: 3 mg/kg/day gentamicin every 8, 12, or 24 hours
  • Dose reductions required in patients with chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury (AKI) or dysfunction
  • The plasma concentration–time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) ratio is the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameter most closely linked to bacterial killing and efficacy
  • Therapeutic drug monitoring: not always necessary for brief administration (≤3 days); trough concentrations should be unmeasurable; typically, two serum concentrations in postdistribution phase (≥1 hour after administration, separated by ≥1.5 half-lives)
  • Cerebrospinal fluid penetration: low
  • Common adverse effects: AKI, ototoxicity
  • Genotyping for the mitochondrial genome variant in MT-RNR1, m.1555A>G can help avoid use of aminoglycosides and prevent ototoxicity
  • Drug-drug interactions: increased acute kidney risk with concomitant amphotericin B, cisplatin, cyclosporine, foscarnet, furosemide, IV radiocontrast agents, methoxyflurane, polymyxins, and vancomycin
  • Indications: sepsis/septic shock; hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia; complicated intraabdominal infections; urinary tract infections; neutropenic fever; acute exacerbation of pulmonary disease (cystic fibrosis patients only); bloodstream infections/IV catheter-related infections; infective endocarditis; multidrug-resistant tuberculosis; select nontuberculous mycobacterial infections; zoonotic infections (i.e., brucellosis, chronic forms of bartonellosis, tularemia, and yersiniosis); febrile neutropenia; surgical prophylaxis for patients undergoing genitourinary, gastrointestinal, or colorectal procedures; orthopedic surgery (antibiotic-impregnated cement); ocular infections (topical preparations); sexually transmitted infections; and select protozoal infections (e.g., amebiasis and cutaneous leishmaniasis)

Introduction and History

Aminoglycoside antibiotics have been used since the 1940s, when systematic screening of soil actinomycetes for the elaboration of antimicrobial substances yielded streptomycin. Produced by a species of Streptomyces (S. grisius), it was the first antibiotic in the aminoglycoside family (Table 1) to be derived, directly or indirectly, from Streptomyces spp. (aminoglycosides with names ending in -mycin) or from Micromonospora spp. (aminoglycosides with names ending in -micin). Neomycin, kanamycin, and gentamicin are fermentation products with two or three chemical constituents. Amikacin, netilmicin, and others are semisynthetic derivatives of the natural product. Plazomicin is a semisynthetic aminoglycoside derived from sisomicin (95). All aminoglycosides share similar physical, chemical, and pharmacologic properties. Four compounds—amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, and plazomicin—are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of serious infections due to gram-negative or gram-positive bacteria (24,32).

Mechanism of Action

The advantages of the aminoglycoside class include rapid bactericidal activity, presence of a postantibiotic effect (PAE), synergy when combined with certain antibiotics, and well-defined pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles (40,50). As polycationic molecules, aminoglycosides bind to anionic compounds on the cell membrane, such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and displace outer membrane divalent cations, leading to increased permeability of the membrane and uptake of aminoglycosides (i.e., self-promoted uptake). Displacement of outer membrane divalent cations by aminoglycosides also compromises the integrity of the cell wall, and it is postulated that this contributes to the observed bactericidal action of aminoglycosides (46,54).

After entering the cell, aminoglycosides bind to the 30S component of the prokaryotic ribosome (35). Affinity for the ribosomal target contributes to the rapid bactericidal action of aminoglycosides (35,56). Aminoglycoside activity is pH-dependent and is inhibited in acidic environments (40). In vitro studies have shown that aminoglycosides have a prolonged PAE, during which bacterial growth is suppressed for a further 3 to 8 hours after drug concentrations fall below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (40,50,96,97).

Figure 1: Chemical structures of aminoglycosides and spectinomycin, grouped by structural subtypes based on their aminocyclitol core rings.

Aminoglycosides are highly synergic with cell wall–active drugs (i.e., β-lactams or glycopeptides) in vitro. In preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) infection models, concomitant use of an aminoglycoside with a β-lactam often enhances bacterial killing and prevents regrowth and resistance emergence to both the aminoglycoside and companion β-lactam (12,26).

PK/PD Parameters

The ratio of the maximum plasma drug concentration to the MIC (Cmax/MIC) ratio has long been considered the PK/PD driver for aminoglycosides, but more recent evidence suggest the area under the plasma concentration–time curve to MIC (AUC/MIC) ratio is the PK/PD parameter most closely linked to bacterial killing and efficacy (3,23,27,30,44,63).

Figure 2: Correlation between PK/PD indices and change in bacterial load. The scatter plots show 24-hr AUC/MIC, Peak/MIC, and % Time>MIC relationships with CFU changes in neutropenic mice.

Spectrum of Activity

Aminoglycosides are active in vitro against both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens, but they are primarily recommended for use in combination therapy for most infections (36,55). Three legacy aminoglycosides—amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin—are broadly active against Staphylococcus spp. (primarily gentamicin) and gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas spp. (primarily amikacin and tobramycin), Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., and Serratia spp. (24,32).

Plazomicin, a newly approved aminoglycoside, is highly active in vitro against Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strains, and most Enterobacterales, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and strains resistant to ≥1 aminoglycosides (18,21,32). Some aminoglycosides have useful activity against mycobacteria, paromomycin has activity against selected colonic protozoan pathogens, and spectinomycin, a related antibiotic, has activity against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (81,84,87,93).

Family of Aminoglycosides in Clinical Use

Table 1: Family of aminoglycosides in clinical use
Generic Name Proprietary Name Source Year Reported Chemistry
Streptomycin None Streptomyces griseus 1944 Unique central aminocyclitol ring
Neomycin Mycifradin, Neobiotic Streptomyces fradiae 1949 Roughly equal proportions of neomycin B and C
Kanamycin Kantrex Streptomyces kanamyceticus 1957 Mixture of 95% kanamycin A and 5% kanamycin B
Paromomycin Humatin S. fradiae 1959 Part of neomycin family
Spectinomycin Trobicin Streptomyces spectabilis 1961 Chemically distinct but closely related to aminoglycosides
Gentamicin Garamycin Micromonospora purpurea and Micromonospora echinospora 1963 Roughly equal proportions of gentamicin C1, C1a, and enantiomers C2 and C2a
Tobramycin Nebcin Streptomyces tenebrarius 1967 Natural 3′-deoxy derivative of kanamycin B
Sisomicina Siseptin Micromonospora inyoensis 1970 Dehydro analogue of gentamicin C1a
Dibekacina,b S. kanamyceticus 1971 Dideoxy derivative of kanamycin B
Amikacinb Amikin S. kanamyceticus 1972 Semisynthetic derivative of kanamycin A
Netilmicinb Netromycin M. inyoensis 1975 N-Ethyl derivative of sisomicin
Isepamicina,b M. purpurea 1978 1-N-S-α-Hydroxy B amino propionyl derivative of gentamicin B
Plazomicin Zemdri M. inyoensis 2018 Semisynthetic derivative of sisomicin

a Approved for human use in countries other than the United States. b Semisynthetic aminoglycosides.

Modified from Wright GD, Berghuis AM, Mobashery S. Aminoglycoside antibiotics: structures, functions, and resistance. In: Rosen BP, Mobashery S, eds. Resolving the Antibiotic Paradox: Progress in Understanding Drug Resistance and Development of New Antibiotics. New York: Plenum; 1998.

Adverse Effects

Although aminoglycosides are effective at bacterial cell killing and have a low potential for allergic reactions, their mechanism of action can also increase the potential for certain toxicities (54,77,80,92).

Nephrotoxicity

The affinity of aminoglycosides for receptors on the proximal renal tubular epithelial cells can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI) (50).

Ototoxicity

Ototoxicity (cochlear and vestibular) and, rarely, neuromuscular blockade are potential aminoglycoside-related side effects (35,56,60).

WarningClinical Pearl

Since the mid-1990s, clinicians have generally adopted weight-based, extended-interval short-course dosing strategies for aminoglycosides, which have been shown to reduce nephrotoxicity while maintaining efficacy and not increasing the occurrence of ototoxicity (1,40,56,77).

Genetic Risk for Ototoxicity

Point-of-care genotyping technology has recently been tested in neonates as a potential screening tool to avoid ototoxicity associated with a mitochondrial genome variant in MT-RNR1, m.1555A>G (11,75).

Current Clinical Use

Amid concerns about toxicity (particularly irreversible vestibular injury), the use of aminoglycosides began to decline in the 1980s in favor of newer antibiotic classes such as fluoroquinolones, which were perceived to be less toxic (35). The 2021 National Safety Network Antimicrobial Use Option Report indicates that amikacin, tobramycin, and gentamicin account for 1% to 2% and 2% to 10% of adult and pediatric antibiotic prescriptions in the inpatient setting, respectively (61).

However, the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative pathogens, including CRE, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp., and nontuberculous mycobacteria—for which therapeutic options are limited—has led to renewed interest in aminoglycosides for use as monotherapy or in combination with other antibacterials (40,77,84,85,89).

Although most studies have failed to demonstrate improved outcomes in patients treated with antibiotic combinations with an aminoglycoside relative to monotherapy (12,70), patients with septic shock receiving combinations including aminoglycosides in hospital settings where aminoglycoside resistance rates are low have had improved outcomes (13,47,71).

Inhaled Aminoglycosides

Cystic Fibrosis

The Cochrane Library Review analyzed outcomes between inhaled aminoglycosides and placebo with regards to treatment-related adverse events of interest (i.e., auditory impairment, pneumothorax, and hemoptysis). However, tinnitus and voice alteration were significantly more common in individuals who received inhaled aminoglycosides (48).

No clinically meaningful differences in outcomes, resistance emergence, and safety were observed in studies that compared the long-term use of different inhalational formulations of aminoglycosides (i.e., tobramycin inhalation powder, tobramycin for inhalation solution [TOBI], inhaled tobramycin [intravenous preparation], and amikacin liposome inhalation suspension) in individuals with cystic fibrosis (48).

Hospital-Acquired/Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Aerosolized aminoglycosides have shown promise in chronic bronchiectatic infections but none are presently approved by the FDA for this indication (45,51,64,68). Aerosolized aminoglycosides also are regularly used in patients with VAP but none is approved for use for this indication. Despite the lack of FDA approval, the HAP/VAP expert guidelines recommend use of aerosolized aminoglycosides or colistin, in combination with systemic agents, for patients with HAP/VAP caused by gram-negative organisms only susceptible to aminoglycosides or polymyxins (55).

A meta-analysis presented in the IDSA/ATS guidelines identified a significant improvement in clinical cure rate with the addition of inhaled antibiotics for the treatment of MDR pathogens, though no differences in mortality were identified. In contrast, the IDSA Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-Negative Infections panel does not suggest the use of nebulized antibiotics for the treatment of respiratory infections caused by resistant gram-negative pathogens due to the lack of benefit observed in clinical trials, concerns regarding unequal distribution in infected lungs (9), and concerns for respiratory complications such as bronchoconstriction in patients receiving aerosolized antibiotics (16,89).

NTM Pulmonary Disease

There are mounting data with inhaled amikacin (parenteral formulation or liposome inhalation suspension) for multidrug regimen for NTM pulmonary disease. However, inhaled amikacin is currently not recommended for inclusion in the initial regimen at this time, and its use should be reserved to patients with MAC pulmonary disease who have failed therapy after at least 6 months of guideline-based therapy (81).

Prophylaxis

Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery suggest gentamicin or tobramycin, 5 mg/kg IV, as an alternative in patients with β-lactam allergy undergoing genitourinary and gastrointestinal procedures (14). For patients undergoing cardiac or vascular surgeries or those with valvular heart disease, prophylaxis with an aminoglycoside is no longer recommended. For patients undergoing colorectal procedures, a mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral neomycin sulfate plus oral erythromycin base or with oral neomycin sulfate plus oral metronidazole is often used with IV prophylaxis (14).

The risk of infection after elective colorectal procedures was significantly reduced by mechanical cleansing of the bowel plus oral administration of neomycin and erythromycin or metronidazole in addition to standard intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in controlled trials (17,59).

A controlled trial demonstrated that an oral selective digestive decontamination containing gentamicin effectively eradicated carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae gastrointestinal carriage (86) and may be used in nosocomial outbreaks (88).

The safety and efficacy of topical gentamicin in cardiac surgery have not been clearly established (4). Multiple tunneled-catheter antibiotic lock studies including a prospective randomized trial (28) have demonstrated reduced catheter-related infections, but emergence of resistant pathogens remains a concern (29).

Aminoglycosides in Orthopedic Surgery

Antibiotic-impregnated cement is used with increasing frequency in primary hip and knee arthroplasties and revision procedures of infected total joint arthroplasties, for which the FDA has approved premixed aminoglycoside in bone cement products (53). Incorporation of larger amounts of antibiotic, usually gentamicin or tobramycin, allows release of higher drug concentrations but may adversely affect mechanical properties. Concentrations and properties vary among producers (5,15,42,62,72).

Persistence of bacterial growth as adherent biofilms remains a potential problem (5,49,79), and AKI has been reported (25,94). To date, one multicenter evaluation failed to show reduction in the risk of infection (69). Additionally, a review of 20 mostly uncontrolled reports of antibiotic-containing spacers did not allow evaluation of whether such adjunctive therapy provided additional benefits to systemic antibiotic therapy (8). Prospective trials in aminoglycoside-containing beads for established osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint–associated infections are needed (38).

Other Clinical Uses

Aminoglycosides are commercially available as topical ophthalmic preparations (e.g., ointments or suspensions) and are frequently used, alone and in combination, to treat patients with ocular infections (73). Oral paromomycin has been employed as an alternative therapy for infection caused by Entamoeba histolytica and ulcerative Leishmania major (2,20,33,37).

Intravesicular gentamicin has been investigated, with anecdotal success, for recurrent UTIs in intermittently catheterized patients (39). Spectinomycin was an alternative agent used intramuscularly in the treatment of N. gonorrhoeae (58), but it is no longer distributed in the United States. It was previously recommended for pregnant women, patients in areas with a high prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance, and men who have sex with men. It showed 98% efficacy in uncomplicated urogenital and anogenital gonococcal infections but only 52% efficacy in gonococcal infections involving the pharynx, where it does not reach therapeutic concentrations (57). Spectinomycin is also not effective in the treatment of infections with Treponema pallidum or Chlamydia trachomatis. Currently, spectinomycin is an alternative therapy for patients who are allergic to β-lactams and for patients who are infected with resistant strains of gonococci. Alternatively, gentamicin has been used to treat urogenital gonococcal infection (19).

Individualized Aminoglycoside Dosing

Aminoglycosides have traditionally been dosed on weight (mg/kg) and an estimate of the kidney function (eCrCL or eGFR) (27). Suggested initial dosing regimens for typical aminoglycosides in clinical use are listed in Table 24.5. Higher initial doses of amikacin (20–30 mg/kg) have been suggested with further dose adjustment after therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), but consensus is needed (31). Given the age and generic status of this drug class, high-quality clinical studies are unfortunately unlikely to be performed to validate these doses apart from plazomicin, which is the most contemporary addition to the armamentarium (66).

However, the lack of alternate therapeutic agents for MDR gram-negative pathogens has led individual institutions to adopt these higher doses (22,76).

Dosing in Obesity

One out of two adults in the United States will be obese by 2030, which impacts aminoglycoside dosing considerations (34). Use of actual weight in obese patients can lead to overexposure (10). To prevent this, the most common approach is to use adjusted body weight, which is ideal body weight plus 40% of the difference between actual and ideal body weight in obese patients (10). The typical definition of obesity for this use of adjusted body weight is when actual weight exceeds ideal body weight by 25% to 30% or if the body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 (67).

More recent work indicates that lean body weight permits simplified aminoglycoside dosing across all weight strata, with clearance best predicted by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (43,65,82). However, most institutions rely on the Cockcroft-Gault equation to estimate clearance and to decide whether once-daily dosing is justifiable (27). Use of TDM after the first dose permits individualization of the aminoglycoside dose (27).

Dosing in Renal Impairment

In resource-poor settings where TDM may be unavailable or delayed, an estimate of kidney function will be more informative than weight to define the daily dose (67). As noted, aminoglycoside clearance is a close surrogate of the measured glomerular filtration rate. Creatinine clearance overestimates GFR by 10% to 15% as it includes tubular secretion (an elimination process not applicable to aminoglycosides). In contrast, use of the most contemporary GFR equations based on serum creatinine (or cystatin C when available) can be translated to an estimate of aminoglycoside clearance (CL) (43).

An AUC target exposure multiplied by this CL estimate approximates the daily dose that is necessary in the individual patient (67). Although this bedside approach is a “best guess,” in the absence of resources to measure aminoglycoside concentrations, use of estimated kidney function is much better than body weight to estimate the daily dose.

Dosing in Dialysis

In patients with kidney failure who require kidney replacement therapies such as dialysis, the dosing of aminoglycosides will depend on the characteristics of the dialysis membrane, duration of dialysis, the patient’s blood pressure during dialysis, and other variables (41,52,83). Patients in sepsis who may be receiving continuous hemofiltration or dialysis the clearance of aminoglycosides is 80% to 90% of the effluent rate or equivalent to a CrCl of 10 to 50 mL/minute (74,83).

For patients on hemodialysis, a traditional dose is given every 48 to 72 hours, and on the day of hemodialysis an additional one-half of the full dose is given (if the traditional dose was administered before dialysis) after dialysis to replace drug that was removed by the dialysis or simply dosed after dialysis. Because of individual variability, serum levels should be measured (6,78).

Administration of high doses of aminoglycosides may be necessary for less susceptible gram-negative bacteria but theoretically increases the risk of ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity in patients with residual renal function. Administration of the dose during dialysis can allow for administration of higher doses (5 mg/kg) and improve the exposure profile compared with the traditional approach of postdialysis dosing (6,90).

For patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis who have a systemic infection and are receiving an intravenous dose of aminoglycoside every 2 to 3 days, it is necessary to give small daily intravenous supplements to replace the drug lost in the dialysate or dosed based on serum concentrations. However, intermittent daily dosing (i.e., amikacin 2 mg/kg daily, gentamicin/netilmicin/tobramycin 0.6 mg/kg daily) of intraperitoneal aminoglycosides (1 exchange daily for at least 6 hours) is now favored over administration of intravenous administration as a measure to minimize toxicity and adaptive resistance while maintaining drug efficacy (91).

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Approach

If therapy is expected to continue for ≥3 days and TDM is available, multiple possible approaches exist with varying levels of precision and complexity as ranked below (highest to lowest precision) that are resource dependent:

  1. Measurement of two concentrations and use of Bayesian software (software using two concentrations to gauge)
  2. Measurement of two concentrations and use of PK equations (linear, so calculate)
  3. Measurement of one concentration and use of Bayesian software
  4. Measurement of one concentration (random) and use of a dosing nomogram
  5. Measurement of two concentrations and interpretation using concentration thresholds (trough and peak)
  6. Measurement of one concentration (peak or trough) and interpretation using concentration thresholds

It is unclear whether every patient administered an aminoglycoside requires an individual PK evaluation (7), but some patient populations may benefit more from TDM than others.

TipTDM Recommendations

Trough concentrations should be unmeasurable (<1 mg/L for gentamicin/tobramycin; <5 mg/L for amikacin). When measuring two concentrations, they should be in the postdistribution phase (≥1 hour after administration) and separated by ≥1.5 half-lives for accurate parameter estimation.

References

1.
Ali MZ, Goetz MB. A meta-analysis of the relative efficacy and toxicity of single daily dosing versus multiple daily dosing of aminoglycosides. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1997;24:796–809.
2.
Alvar J, Croft S, Olliaro P. Chemotherapy in the treatment and control of leishmaniasis. Advances in Parasitology. 2006;61:223–74.
3.
Ambrose PG, Bhavnani SM, Rubino CM, et al. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007;44:79–86.
4.
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2013.
5.
Anagnostakos K. Antibiotic-impregnated bone cement in orthopaedic surgery. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. 2020.
6.
Ariano RE, Fine A, Sitar DS, Rexrode S, Zelenitsky SA. Adequacy of a vancomycin dosing regimen in patients receiving high-flux hemodialysis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 1997.
7.
Bailey TC, Little JR, Littenberg B, Reichley RM, Dunagan WC. A meta-analysis of extended-interval dosing versus multiple daily dosing of aminoglycosides. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2013.
8.
Barth RE, Vogely HC, Hoepelman AI, Peters EJ. To bead or not to bead? Treatment of osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint-associated infections with gentamicin bead chains. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2010;36:6–12.
9.
Bassetti M, Vena A, Russo A. Inhaled colistin or tobramycin for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019.
10.
Bauer LA, Black DJ, Lill JS. Vancomycin dosing in morbidly obese patients. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2012.
11.
Bitner-Glindzicz M, Pembrey M, Duncan A, et al. Prevalence of mitochondrial 1555A>g mutation in european children. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360:640–2.
12.
Bliziotis IA, Samonis G, Vardakas KZ, Chrysanthopoulou S, Falagas ME. Effect of aminoglycoside and beta-lactam combination therapy versus beta-lactam monotherapy on the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;41:149–58.
13.
Bowers DR, Lichtenberger P, Gentry LO. Aminoglycoside combination therapy for pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2010.
14.
Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2013;70:195–283.
15.
Buchholz HW, Engelbrecht H. Depot effects of various antibiotics mixed with palacos resins. Chirurg. 1984;41:511–5.
16.
Burgess DS et al. Practical guidance for clinical implementation of inhaled antibiotics. Pharmacotherapy. 2022.
17.
Cannon JA, Altom LK, Deierhoi RJ, et al. Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce surgical site infection following elective colorectal resections. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2012;55:1160–6.
18.
Castanheira M, Davis AP, Mendes RE, Serio AW, Krause KM, Flamm RK. In vitro activity of plazomicin against gram-negative and gram-positive isolates collected from u.s. Hospitals and comparative activities of aminoglycosides against carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae and isolates carrying carbapenemase genes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2018;62:e00313–18.
19.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. 2021;70(4):1–187.
20.
Chunge RN et al. Treatment of amebiasis with paromomycin. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1985.
21.
Clark JA, Burgess DS. Plazomicin: A new aminoglycoside in the fight against antimicrobial resistance. Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease. 2019;6.
22.
Cotta MO, Roberts JA, Lipman J. Antibiotic dose optimization in critically ill patients. Medical Intensive Care. 2015.
23.
Craig WA. Basic pharmacodynamics of antibacterials with clinical applications to the use of beta-lactams, glycopeptides, and linezolid. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 2003;17:479–501.
24.
Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: Rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2003;36:S1–10.
25.
Curtis JM, Sternhagen V, Batts D. Acute renal failure after placement of tobramycin-impregnated bone cement in an infected total knee arthroplasty. Pharmacotherapy. 2005;25:876–80.
26.
Davis BD. Mechanism of bactericidal action of aminoglycosides. Microbiological Reviews. 1999;51:341–50.
27.
Deziel-Evans LM, Murphy JE, Job ML. Correlation of pharmacokinetic indices with therapeutic outcome in patients receiving aminoglycosides. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2006.
28.
Drosu A et al. Antibiotic lock solution for catheter-related bloodstream infection prevention. Journal of Vascular Access. 2013.
29.
Drosu A et al. Emergence of resistance with antibiotic lock solutions. Journal of Vascular Access. 2014.
30.
Drusano GL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007;45:S89–95.
31.
Drusano GL et al. Higher aminoglycoside doses for nosocomial pneumonia. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2019.
32.
Edson RS, Terrell CL. The aminoglycosides. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1991;66:1158–64.
33.
El-On J, Jacobs GP, Weinrauch L. Topical chemotherapy of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Parasitology Today. 1986;4:8–12.
34.
Finkelstein EA, Khavjou OA, Thompson H, et al. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2012;42:563–70.
35.
Fourmy D, Recht MI, Blanchard SC, Puglisi JD. Structure of the a site of escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA complexed with an aminoglycoside antibiotic. Science. 1996;274:1367–71.
36.
Gilbert DN. Aminoglycosides. 2009.
37.
Gilles HM et al. Paromomycin in intestinal amebiasis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1971.
38.
Gogia JS, Meehan JP, Di Cesare PE, Jamali AA. Local antibiotic therapy in osteomyelitis. Seminars in Plastic Surgery. 2009;23:100–7.
39.
Hachen HJ. Intravesical gentamicin in recurrent urinary tract infection. Paraplegia. 1983;21:249–54.
40.
Hancock REW. Aminoglycoside uptake and mode of action—with special reference to streptomycin and gentamicin. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 1981;8:249–76.
41.
Heintz BH, Matzke GR, Dager WE. Antimicrobial dosing concepts and recommendations for critically ill adult patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy or intermittent hemodialysis. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29:562–77.
42.
Hendriks JG, Horn JR van, Mei HC van der, Busscher HJ. Backgrounds of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and prosthesis-related infection. Biomaterials. 2004;25:545–56.
43.
Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin c. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;367:20–9.
44.
Kashuba AD, Nafziger AN, Drusano GL, Bertino JS. Optimizing aminoglycoside therapy for nosocomial pneumonia caused by gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1999;43:623–9.
45.
Kollef MH, Ricard JD, Roux D. A randomized trial of the amikacin fosfomycin inhalation system for the adjunctive therapy of gram-negative ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 2012;141:921–9.
46.
Krause KM, Serio AW, Kane TR, Connolly LE. Aminoglycosides: An overview. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2016;6:a027029.
47.
Kumar A, Safdar N, Kethireddy S, Chateau D. A survival benefit of combination antibiotic therapy for serious infections associated with sepsis and septic shock is contingent only on the risk of death. Critical Care Medicine. 2010;38:1651–64.
48.
Langton Hewer SC, Smyth AR. Antibiotic strategies for eradicating pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018.
49.
Lewis K. Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2019;5:48–56.
50.
Lortholary O, Tod M, Cohen Y, Petitjean O. Aminoglycosides. Medical Clinics of North America. 1995;79:761–87.
51.
MacLean N et al. Inhaled antibiotics in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Chest. 2011.
52.
Matzke GR, Lucarotti RL, Shapiro HS. Controlled comparison of gentamicin and tobramycin nephrotoxicity. American Journal of Nephrology. 1984.
53.
McConoughey SJ, Howlin R, Granger JF, et al. Biofilms in periprosthetic orthopedic infections. Future Microbiology. 2014;9:987–1007.
54.
Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Glupczynski Y, Tulkens PM. Aminoglycosides: Activity and resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1999;43:727–37.
55.
Moellering RC. In vitro antibacterial activity of the aminoglycoside antibiotics. Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 1983;5:S212–32.
56.
Moore RD, Lietman PS, Smith CR. Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: Importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1987;155:93–9.
57.
Moran JS. Gonorrhea. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1995.
58.
Moran JS, Levine WC. Drugs of choice for the treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1995;20:S47–65.
59.
Morris MS, Graham LA, Chu DI, Cannon JA, Hawn MT. Oral antibiotic bowel preparation significantly reduces surgical site infection rates and readmission rates in elective colorectal surgery. Annals of Surgery. 2015;261:1034–40.
60.
Munckhof WJ, Grayson ML, Turnidge JD. A meta-analysis of studies on the safety and efficacy of aminoglycosides given either once daily or as divided doses. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 1996;37:645–63.
61.
National Healthcare Safety Network. Antimicrobial use option report. 2021.
62.
Neut D, Belt H van de, Stokroos I, Horn JR van, Mei HC van der, Busscher HJ. Biomaterial-associated infection of gentamicin-loaded PMMA beads in orthopaedic revision surgery. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2001;47:885–91.
63.
Nicolau DP. Pharmacodynamic optimization of beta-lactams in the patient care setting. Critical Care. 2006;10:S1–8.
64.
Niederman MS et al. Inhaled amikacin adjunctive to intravenous standard-of-care antibiotics in mechanically ventilated patients with gram-negative pneumonia (INHALE). Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;20:330–40.
65.
Pai MP. Aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics and dosing: Insights from recent studies. Pharmacotherapy. 2017.
66.
Pai MP. Aminoglycoside dosing in the era of multidrug resistance. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 2019.
67.
Pai MP, Bearden DT. Antimicrobial dosing considerations in obese adult patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2012;27:1081–91.
68.
Palmer LB. Aerosolized antibiotics in critically ill ventilated patients. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2011;17:458–63.
69.
Parvizi J, Saleh KJ, Ragland PS, Pour AE, Mont MA. Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total hip replacement. Acta Orthopaedica. 2008;79:335–41.
70.
Paul M, Benuri-Silbiger I, Soares-Weiser K, Leibovici L. Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients. BMJ. 2006;332:1328–36.
71.
Paul M, Shani V, Muchtar E, Leibovici L. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for sepsis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2010;54:4851–63.
72.
Penner MJ, Duncan CP, Masri BA. The in vitro elution characteristics of antibiotic-loaded CMW and palacos-r bone cements. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1996;11:939–44.
73.
Perez KK et al. Topical aminoglycosides in ophthalmic practice. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2015.
74.
Pinder M, Bellomo R, Lipman J. Pharmacological principles of antibiotic prescription in the critically ill. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2002;30:570–94.
75.
Prezant TR, Agapian JV, Bohlman MC, et al. Mitochondrial ribosomal RNA mutation associated with both antibiotic-induced and non-syndromic deafness. Nature Genetics. 1993;4:289–94.
76.
Roberts JA, Lipman J. Pharmacokinetic issues for antibiotics in the critically ill patient. Critical Care Medicine. 2014;37:840–51.
77.
Rybak MJ, Abate BJ, Kang SL, Ruffing MJ, Lerner SA, Drusano GL. Prospective evaluation of the effect of an aminoglycoside dosing regimen on rates of observed nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2008;43:1549–55.
78.
Santre C, Georges H, Jacquier JM, et al. Amikacin levels in bronchial secretions of 10 pneumonia patients with respiratory support treated once daily versus twice daily. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1995;39:264–7.
79.
Seldes RM, Winiarsky R, Jordan LC, et al. Liquid gentamicin in bone cement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2005;87:268–72.
80.
Selimoglu E. Aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2007;13:119–26.
81.
Sharma SK, Mohan A. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2011;133:351–60.
82.
Smit C, De Hoogd S, Bruggemann RJM, Knibbe CAJ. Obesity and drug pharmacology: A review of the influence of obesity on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology. 2018;14:275–85.
83.
Sowinski KM, Magner SJ, Lucksiri A, Scott MK, Hamburger RJ, Mueller BA. Influence of hemodialysis on gentamicin pharmacokinetics. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 1993.
84.
Stamm WE. Spectinomycin in the treatment of gonorrhea. Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 1983;5:S499–502.
85.
Standiford HD et al. Aminoglycosides in clinical practice. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1973.
86.
Stoma I, Karpov I, et al. Decolonization of intestinal carriage of carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae. Journal of Infection. 2018.
87.
Sundar S, Chakravarty J. Paromomycin in the treatment of leishmaniasis. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. 2007;16:1063–71.
88.
Tacconelli E et al. ESCMID-EUCIC clinical guidelines on decolonization of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria carriers. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2019;25:807–17.
89.
Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, Duin D van, Clancy CJ. Infectious diseases society of america 2022 guidance on the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing enterobacterales (ESBL-e), carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales (CRE), and pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-p. aeruginosa). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2022.
90.
Teigen MM, Duffull S, Dang L, Johnson DW. Dosing of gentamicin in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2006;46:1259–67.
91.
Warady BA, Bakkaloglu S, Newland J, et al. Consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of catheter-related infections and peritonitis in pediatric patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: 2012 update. Peritoneal Dialysis International. 2012;32:S32–86.
92.
Wargo KA, Edwards JD. Aminoglycoside-induced nephrotoxicity. Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2006;19:110–9.
93.
White NJ. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in antimicrobial therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015.
94.
Winkler H, Janata O, Gattringer R. Acute renal failure following use of gentamicin-containing bone cement. Clinical Nephrology. 2000;54:343.
95.
Wright GD, Berghuis AM, Mobashery S. Aminoglycoside antibiotics: Structures, functions, and resistance, editorsRosen BP, Mobashery S. 1998.
96.
Zhanel GG, Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic contributions to postantibiotic effects. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 1992;23:329–40.
97.
Zhanel GG, Hoban DJ, Harding GKM. The postantibiotic effect: A review of in vitro and in vivo data. DICP, The Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 1991;25:153–63.